#Epson stylus photo r1800 vs 2200 driver
#Epson stylus photo r1800 vs 2200 pro

Images tend to be well exposed, so I don't need to spend much time in either PS or while

#Epson stylus photo r1800 vs 2200 driver

The time I needed to tweak things to get it right using the printer driver controls. With the Stylus Photo my monitor and prints looked remarkably similar and less than 5% of Significant amount of attention and fiddling in order to get the results I want. The last thing I want to do is get a printer that requires a One of the things that IĮnjoy about digital image editing is that it gets me out of working in the darkroom, which I Significant tweaking, and that is just what I am wanting to avoid. The reviews I have read on the Epson R1800 tend to emphasize that the printer requires With an inkjet printer anyway (I haven't regularly sold prints in years) as I am still notĬonvinced that they are equal to standard photo prints in terms of longevity. Years ago on the Stylus Photo still look good and I personally would not sell prints made Printer for personal prints, portfolio and promotional materials, I really only need to printĪnd as I said earlier, the longevity of the prints does not concern me. The large footprint of the i9900 concerns me a bit but its smaller cousin the iP8500ĭoesn't seem to get the same high marks for color rendition. Paper with the printer and notes that the prints are a little yellow, which can be easily Last night I read the i9900 reviews at Amazon. Then some lucky soul is going to get a great deal on an S9000 in fantastic condition! When Canon releases the eventual successor to the i9900, I'll watch for the closeout sales and pick one up in the $250-300 range.

#Epson stylus photo r1800 vs 2200 pro

I like glossy prints, and I only print on Canon Photo Paper Pro with Canon-brand ink cartridges.Īlthough the i9900 supports a wider color gamut (or better color fidelity or something) with its two extra ink colors, prints at higher resolution and does borderless 13x19, I don't print enough to justify the purchase price, particularly when the S9000 continues to perform so spectacularly. I don't have any idea what the longevity of the prints will be. They use the same ink cartridges, and neither has ever clogged, not once. The S9000 gets infrequent-to-periodic use, and the i950 is rarely used. I haven't owned an Epson printer in decades (!), but I currently own two older-generation Canon inkjets: an S9000 (three years old this month) and an i950 (a little over two years). Other store that will let a person do that. Let me return the Epson after 7 frustrating months of (attempted) use.

If I do wind up getting a new printer, it will likely be purchased from Costco. Models that tend to clog less than others? Or is using an inkjet printer unrealistic for

So how is it with modern inkjets? Do Epsons clog more than Canon printers? Are there Only one experiencing clogging with Epson printers and most folks were printing more When I checked out various forums some time back it appeared to me that I wasn't the Go for relatively long periods between printing sessions and be fine, but even it began My oneĮxperience with a newer Epson printer (a 785 EPX, if memory serves me.) was terrible: it The fact that I seldom need to print something may be the most important one. Panel worked fine for me), longetivity isn't an issue and I print infrequently. I don't wantĪnything larger than 8x10, I print mainly color but sometimes B&W, I want to avoidĮxtensive color calibration steps (the quick and dirty calibration in the ColorSync control My needs are relatively simple compared to a lot of folks on this forum. Unlike my ten year old LaserWriterģ60, I could not find a way to connect the Epson printer to a modern Mac.

Has been retired along with my PowerMac 7300/200. I am also in the market for a new photo printer.